On that Stanford study...

Image placeholder title

By now, you’ve probably heard about the Stanford study that made headlines a few weeks ago, thanks to its claim that organic food has not been proven to be any more nutritious than conventional food. This rabble-rousing claim is the result of a very narrow definition of “nutrition”, and we wanted to share Mark Bittman’s rebuttal in the New York Times.

Please comment with your thoughts! We’re very curious to know what you think…